(image source: www.moneycontrol.com) |
Rahul
Gandhi (Vice-President of the Indian National Congress-INC) and Arnab Goswami
(the Editor-in-Chief of Times Now) grabbed all the attention this past week
with what was being touted as the biggest political interview of the year. This
ensured that Arun Jaitley’s interview to CNBC TV18’s Shereen Bhan went unnoticed.
This week, we try and make sense of what he said.
Why
is this interview important?
Arun
Jaitley is a senior leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). At present, he
holds the post of the Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha (the Upper House
of Indian Parliament). In the past, he has been a Cabinet Minister when the
BJP-led government was in power at Centre in the early 2000’s.
There
are two reasons why what he says is of extreme importance. Firstly, he is a
member of the Parliamentary Board of the BJP, which is the main decision making
body of the party. Secondly, he is considered to be very close to Mr. Narendra
Modi. Thus, knowing what Mr. Jaitley says can help us understand the policies
of the BJP.
Let us
now get into what Mr. Jaitley said on various issues and compare the BJP’s
views with those of the UPA (United Progressive Alliance) government.
On
the Banking Transaction Tax
Background: In our post, What did Baba Ramdev say? , we told you about how the BJP is seriously considering the proposal to
replace the present taxation system with a single Banking Transaction Tax and
how Mr. Jaitley had reservations over the issue. In this interview, he
re-iterates his point.
UPA: The UPA government, led by the
INC, is working on the Direct Taxes Code (DTC) bill which will reform the
present Income Tax Act. It is not considering the proposal of the introduction
of BTT.
BJP: In the interview, Mr. Jaitley
clarifies that the BJP has not completely accepted the proposal of BTT. He says
that he agrees that the proposal is a popular and attractive one but he is also
aware of the difficulties in the implementation of such a proposal and hence a
lot of debate is required with regard to the proposal.
On
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
Background: Just a couple of days ago, the
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government in Delhi announced that it disagreed with the
previous Delhi government and hence was withdrawing the decision of allowing
FDI in multi-brand retail trade in Delhi.
UPA: The Union Cabinet in September,
2012 had approved 51% FDI in multi brand retail trade in India. But due to
opposition from the BJP and many other parties, it decided to let the
individual states take the final call on whether they would allow it in their respective
states.
BJP: Mr. Jaitley says, “I have absolutely no problem with FDI in
several areas. I have no difficulty as far as FDI in infrastructure and defense
is concerned but it is FDI sector wise in some areas that we are concerned with
and certainly FDI in retail is one of those areas.”
He goes on to give an explanation, “As far as
retail is concerned don’t forget that you have a very large number of people –
4 crore traders in this country, you are looking at almost 20 crore people
which is broadly one fifth of one sixth of India's population, the largest
employer after agriculture. Therefore if that is a section which is
uncomfortable about a particular policy, we have opposed it as far as day one
is concerned.”
On Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Background:
The Goods and Services Tax is another big taxation proposal that seeks to
reform the present system of indirect taxes. In fact, it’s importance can be
gauged by the fact that if GST becomes a reality, then just by that decision
alone, India’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) will grow by an extra 1-2%.
UPA:
Finance Minister P. Chidambaram is very keen to pass the GST bill but it is
stuck due to opposition from various states ruled by the BJP and other
political parties. The states have reservations regarding their revenues
(income) because if the GST is introduced, then the taxes collecting power
would shift to the Centre and states would get the money from the centre as per
an agreed formula. In fact, in this year’s budget, Mr. Chidambaram set aside
9000 crores of rupees to show his commitment to compensating the states for
their loss of revenue in the initial years.
BJP: Mr.
Jaitley says, “The GST is not a BJP versus Congress issue. I personally am
quite convinced about the virtues of the GST. There are some states which are
lesser consuming states which certainly had concerns as far as the UPA
government is concerned and its fairness to implement the GST as far as the
states are concerned. Now in Madhya Pradesh there is a problem, there were BJP
and NDA governments which supported the GST proposal, there were NDA
governments which opposed the GST proposals.”
When he was asked a direct question whether GST
would be a part of BJP’s manifesto, he avoided a direct reply by saying that if
and when GST is to be implemented in the country then that will require a consensus as
far as states are concerned.
On Fuel Subsidies
The present situation is such that the diesel
prices are increasing every month. This is because all this while we have been
paying a subsidized price. Now, the government has decided to slowly move to
market determined prices. Every time a diesel price hike is affected, there is
a demand from the BJP to withdraw it.
In this interview, however, Mr. Jaitley takes
what might be called a slightly unpopular stand. He says that the BJP
understands the importance of maintaining the fiscal balance. (Fiscal deficit, in
simple terms, means the difference between the income and expenditure of the
government. If subsidies are provided, it increases the expenditure). What this
means is that if and when the BJP comes to power, they may not reduce the
prices of diesel. However, Mr. Jaitley also said that these subsidies had to be
targeted towards the poor as they could not afford these high prices.
These were some of the major issues discussed in
the interview. Apart from these, Mr. Jaitley also stressed upon how the BJP
intended to make India a manufacturing hub. He also said that the coal blocks that
were allocated by the UPA should be looked at afresh.
The full interview can be read and seen here.
No comments:
Post a Comment